<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey!  NBC Suits!  Wake Up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimwilli.com/2010/01/13/hey-nbc-suits-wake-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimwilli.com/2010/01/13/hey-nbc-suits-wake-up/</link>
	<description>From Audience Research &#38; Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:42:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Heaton</title>
		<link>http://www.jimwilli.com/2010/01/13/hey-nbc-suits-wake-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Heaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimwilli.com/?p=124#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Josh, but I have to side with Jim. This is a very thoughtful -- and accurate -- assessment of what&#039;s happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Josh, but I have to side with Jim. This is a very thoughtful &#8212; and accurate &#8212; assessment of what&#8217;s happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Willi</title>
		<link>http://www.jimwilli.com/2010/01/13/hey-nbc-suits-wake-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Willi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimwilli.com/?p=124#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>Since I fall in the demographic that prefers Conan to Leno, I have a bit different take on this whole issue than you do. Though I agree, and thought beforehand, that Conan was a bad fit for the Tonight Show, I don&#039;t think he&#039;s a bad fit of a host.

In the end, whether it&#039;s Leno, Conan, Ferguson, or Letterman, I think all these hosts and shows only have niche markets and I think the balance was just right for years and years. Leno and Letterman are there to appeal to the 35-60 demo (I don&#039;t know demoes, so I made that one up) and Conan and Ferguson, being on later in the night, fit very well with the 17-34 demo (also made up). The two latter, later hosts were both more of a guilty pleasure than a serious talk show, and that made it all the better.

I&#039;d be interested to see the hard number ratings of Leno, Conan, Fallon, etc. to see how big the disparity is from one host and show to the next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I fall in the demographic that prefers Conan to Leno, I have a bit different take on this whole issue than you do. Though I agree, and thought beforehand, that Conan was a bad fit for the Tonight Show, I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s a bad fit of a host.</p>
<p>In the end, whether it&#8217;s Leno, Conan, Ferguson, or Letterman, I think all these hosts and shows only have niche markets and I think the balance was just right for years and years. Leno and Letterman are there to appeal to the 35-60 demo (I don&#8217;t know demoes, so I made that one up) and Conan and Ferguson, being on later in the night, fit very well with the 17-34 demo (also made up). The two latter, later hosts were both more of a guilty pleasure than a serious talk show, and that made it all the better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see the hard number ratings of Leno, Conan, Fallon, etc. to see how big the disparity is from one host and show to the next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

